Samaritans

Samaritans, Eunuchs, and Philistines (Isaiah 53; Acts 8:26-40)

Before we address today’s passage, we have to start with Isaiah 53.

Isaiah 53 

Who would ever believe it?
    Who would possibly accept what we’ve been told?
    Who has witnessed the awesome power and plan of the Eternal in action?

 Out of emptiness he came, like a tender shoot from rock-hard ground.
He didn’t look like anything or anyone of consequence—
    he had no physical beauty to attract our attention.

So he was despised and forsaken by men,
    this man of suffering, grief’s patient friend.
As if he was a person to avoid, we looked the other way;
    he was despised, forsaken, and we took no notice of him.

Yet it was our suffering he carried,
    our pain and distress, our sick-to-the-soul-ness.
We just figured that God had rejected him,
    that God was the reason he hurt so badly.

 But he was hurt because of us; he suffered so.
    Our wrongdoing wounded and crushed him.
He endured the breaking that made us whole.
    The injuries he suffered became our healing.

 We all have wandered off, like shepherdless sheep,
    scattered by our aimless striving and endless pursuits;
The Eternal One laid on him, this silent sufferer,
    the sins of us all.

And in the face of such oppression and suffering—silence.
    Not a word of protest, not a finger raised to stop it.
Like a sheep to a shearing, like a lamb to be slaughtered,
    he went—oh so quietly, oh so willingly.

Oppressed and condemned, he was taken away.
    From this generation, who was there to complain?
Who was there to cry “Foul”? 

He was, after all, cut off from the land of the living,
Smacked and struck, not on his account, because of how my people (my people!)
disregarded the lines between right and wrong.
    They snuffed out his life.

And when he was dead, he was buried with the disgraced
    in borrowed space (among the rich), even though he did no wrong by word or deed.               Yet the Eternal One planned to crush him all along, to bring him to grief, this innocent servant of God.

When he puts his life in sin’s dark place, in the pit of wrongdoing,
    this servant of God will see his children and have his days prolonged.
For in His servant’s hand, the Eternal’s deepest desire will come to pass and flourish.

As a result of the trials and troubles that wrack his soul,
    God’s servant will see light and be content
Because he knows, he really understands, what it’s about. As God says,   

“My just servant will justify countless others by taking on their punishment and bearing it away. Because he exposed his very self - laid bare his soul to the vicious grasping of death -
and was counted among the worst, I will count him among the best.

I will allot this one, My servant, a share in all that is of any value,
because he took on himself the sin of many
    and acted on behalf of those who broke My law.”
[1]

Most rabbinic interpretations thought this was about the nation Israel (see references at 52:1453:2410) as the suffering servant of God. But, Israel failed in their calling. Just like Jesus is referred to as the new and better Adam, Jesus is also the new and better Israel. Isaiah is writing about Jesus after all; the original audience just didn’t know it.

“Jesus had become a remnant of one. He was the embodiment of faithful Israel, the truly righteous and suffering servant.”[2]

This will be important for today’s passage as we read about Philip introducing someone to Jesus starting with Isaiah 53.

26 Now an angel of the Lord said to Philip, “Go south to the road—the desert road—that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza.” 27 So he started out, and on his way he met an Ethiopian eunuch, an important official in charge of all the treasury of the Kandake (which means “queen of the Ethiopians”).

This man had gone to Jerusalem to worship,28 and on his way home was sitting in his chariot reading the Book of Isaiah the prophet. 29 The Spirit told Philip, “Go to that chariot and stay near it.”30 Then Philip ran up to the chariot and heard the man reading Isaiah the prophet.

Fun fact relating to biblical language: to Greeks and Romans, Ethiopia was at the ends of the earth. Homer said that Ethiopians lived “at the world’s end.” Herodotus claimed that Ethiopia “stretches farthest of the inhabited lands in the direction of the sun’s decline.” When Jesus sent his disciples to “the ends of the earth,” (Acts 1:8) they were probably thinking, “As far as Ethiopia????”[3] Yes, and further, of course :)

Second fact that is not so fun: This particular Ethiopian – who had been to Jerusalem to worship with the Jewish people - was actually an outcast in Judaism since, as a eunuch, he was in a constant state of ritual impurity (Leviticus 21:2022:24). Jewish law excluded eunuchs from public worship in the temple.[4]Josephus reflects a general attitude regarding eunuchs:

“Let those that have made themselves eunuchs be had in detestation; and avoid any conversation with them who have deprived themselves of…that fruit of generation which God has given to men for the increase of their kind; let such be driven away, as if they had killed their children, since they beforehand have lost what should procure them.”

The third fact – fun again - is that God directs Philip to southwest Palestine—the OT land of the Philistines. Gaza itself is one of the five cities of the Philistines.[5]  More on this later.

“Do you understand what you are reading?” Philip asked.31 “How can I,” he said, “unless someone explains it to me?” So he invited Philip to come up and sit with him.32 This is the passage of Scripture the eunuch was reading:

“He was led like a sheep to the slaughter, and as a lamb before its shearer is silent,
    so he did not open his mouth.
33 In his humiliation he was deprived of justice.
    Who can speak of his descendants?  For his life was taken from the earth.”[
b

34 The eunuch asked Philip, “Tell me, please, who is the prophet talking about, himself or someone else?” 35 Then Philip began with that very passage of Scripture and told him the good news about Jesus.

It is likely that Philip started explaining how Jesus is the new and better Israel, the truly perfect Suffering Servant, the divine Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world.  After beginning with Isaiah 53, Philip probably went to some Scriptures called "Scriptures of the Servant of the Lord and the Righteous Sufferer" (i.e., Isaiah 42:1-44:549:1-1350:4-11; and Psalms 223469118).[6]

While a doctrine of a suffering Messiah was largely considered unthinkable (the Messiah would be triumphant; it was Israel that was the Righteous Sufferer), there was a small remnant in Judaism that had a concept of a suffering Messiah.[7]

The Babylonian Talmud[8] says: “The Messiah, what is his name? The Rabbis say, The Leper Scholar, as it is said, ‘surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him a leper, smitten of God and afflicted...’” (Sanhedrin 98b).

Midrash[9] Ruth Rabbah says: “Another explanation (of Ruth 2:14): He is speaking of king Messiah… eat of the bread,’ that is, the bread of the kingdom; ‘and dip thy morsel in the vinegar,’ this refers to his chastisements, as it is said, ‘But he was wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our iniquities.’”[10]

36 As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, “Look, here is water. What can stand in the way of my being baptized?” [37]  38 And he gave orders to stop the chariot. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him.

39 When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord suddenly took Philip away, and the eunuch did not see him again, but went on his way rejoicing.[11] 40 Philip, however, appeared at Azotus and traveled about, preaching the gospel in all the towns until he reached Caesarea.[12]

Everybody had to be immersed in a mikveh, a ritual bath, before entering the temple. In the ancient mikva’ot (plural of mikveh) found in Jerusalem, there  are a set of steps going down to the mikveh in an impure state on one side, and steps going up where the pilgrim will emerge fresh and ritually clean.[13]

Previously, a eunuch could not be baptized into Judaism and was not allowed to worship in the temple. However, it turns out that Isaiah has something important to say to the eunuchs as well:  

“To the eunuchs who keep my Sabbaths, who choose what pleases me and hold fast to my covenant—to them I will give within my temple and its walls a memorial and a name better than sons and daughters; I will give them an everlasting name that will not be cut off. 

And foreigners who bind themselves to the Lord to serve him, to love the name of the Lord, and to worship him, all who keep the Sabbath without desecrating it and who hold fast to my covenant—these I will bring to my holy mountain and give them joy in my house of prayer. 

Their burnt offerings and sacrifices will be accepted on my altar; for my house will be called a house of prayer for all nations.” (Isaiah 56:38)

This guy has probably been ready to be baptized for a long time. Finally, the outsider was invited in, and he went on his way rejoicing.

 * * * * *

Why does this matter to us today?

Philip goes three places as an evangelist after he is one of those scattered from Jerusalem due to persecution. In each of these places he meets people who represent more than just themselves. There are three types of people to whom Philip took the message of Jesus. We still have these types around us today.

To Samaritans (Jews who worshipped in a rival temple). Samaritans weren’t “outsiders”—they were failed insiders. And failed insiders are often harder to love than total outsiders. They were the group that “should have known better.”  Maybe today, it’s our spiritual cousins inside the larger Christian world whom we believe have deeply intertwined their faith with non-Christian values and priorities – and they should have known better.

  • Christians who worship in alternative Christian sects, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses or the LDS church, where they claim additional revelation to the authority of the Bible and present a view of Jesus that is very different from orthodox Christianity.

  • I have heard the term “Chrislam” used to describe those who try to make Islam and Christianity compatible in spite of starkly differing views of Jesus.

  • When the values of the Empire start to become the values of the church, that probably counts, too.  On the Right, this could be concern for Christians becoming “woke.” On the Left, it’s a concern over Christian Nationalism.

That’s my best analogies for today. In the best case scenario, a Samaritan could simply be the “wrong kind” of Christian – at least as we see it. In the worst case scenario, they have intertwined their faith with non-Christian values and priorities so much that their belief and practice place them somewhere outside of orthodox Christian history and tradition.

What should our response be? Philip did not abandon them. He went to them first. They were not enemies to push away or persecute or mock. They were God’s children, and they needed to hear the truth about who God really is as revealed in Jesus.  

To a eunuch (who wasn’t allowed to worship in the temple.) He carried profound stigma, as he was perceived by pretty much everyone as sexually ambiguous and damaged. Eunuchs were generally an outcast everywhere except by those who castrated them. By cultural and societal standards, he was no longer “a real man.” (I didn’t repeat some of the really blistering things Josephus had to say.) He represents the category of people who had been told - explicitly or implicitly – that they no longer had value. “You are too damaged. God is not for people like you. You are not welcome to worship with us.”

Notice what Philip does. Philip does not distance or degrade him. He runs to him and sits with him and opens Scripture. It turns out this man was just waiting to be told about Jesus. A man who had been widely shunned and always been told he could not be a part of the family of God was now being told that he could be a part of the family of God. No wonder he responds with, “What could possibly stop me from being baptized?”

Societal outcasts are not enemies to push away or persecute or mock. They are God’s image bearers, and they needed to hear the truth about who God really is as revealed in Jesus, and invited to become an insider. 

To Philistines (who worshipped false gods in rival temples). They are the archetypal enemies in Israel’s memory—Goliath’s people, oppressors, idolaters. God’s people simply did not go to Philistia. These are not the “compromised insiders.” They’re not “unvalued outsiders.” These are the people followers of Jesus experience as  actively hostile to our faith. Today, this could include:

  • People who are aggressively anti-Christian (mockery, discrimination, persecution)

  • People whose culture norms or beliefs directly and publicly challenge Christian faith and practice

What would Philip do? Would he panic, or match hate with hate?  No. He went to Philistia, right into their cities. He actually runs into Philistia. He didn’t avoid or dismiss them; he took Jesus to them.

Unlike Jonah, who really hated that God wanted to spare Ninevah, Philip seems really excited about letting enemies and outcasts know that God wants them to be part of His family. He’s not afraid of them or disgusted by them; he’s on mission. He is going to the highways and byways and compelling them to come in.

They are not enemies to push away or persecute or mock. They are God’s image bearers, and they need to hear the truth about how God as revealed in Jesus loves them and invites them, like Paul, to repentance and restoration. 

* * * * *

Just to recap:  

  • for the Samaritans, Philip went to them and told them about Jesus. There was great rejoicing.

  • for the eunuch, Philip went to him and told him about Jesus, and there was great rejoicing.

  • as for the Philistines, it doesn’t say, but he told them about Jesus, and I’m pretty sure rejoicing continued 

I think Philip reminds us that the whole world is loved by Jesus, not just some people here and there. It’s too easy to create silos filled with “those” that we just can’t imagine interacting with or befriending or caring for. It’s too easy to give harsh nicknames and tell cruel jokes and post memes that paint “them” in the worst possible light.

It’s too easy to be like Jonah, resentful that God cares about them too, and extra resentful that we might be the one with boots on the ground in places that are really uncomfortable and that seem impossible.

What if we were more like Philip, following the prompting of the Holy Spirit to keep moving closer to everyone?

The church must be filled with those reaching out to the Samaritans, the eunuchs, the Philistines. That’s a crucial part of our mission field. If we want to follow in the footsteps of Jesus (and Philip), we will move closer so that the good news of Jesus may bring great rejoicing.

_____________________________________________________________________________

[1] “‘It is written: “And he was numbered with the transgressors”; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.’” —Jesus, in Luke 22:37

[2] Tremper Longman III and Raymond B. Dillard, “Isaiah,” An Introduction to the Old Testament,

[3] Also, Isaiah uses this phrase (Isaiah 45:22: "Turn to me and be saved, all the ends of the earth!”), and it would fit well if Isaiah is going to be the starting point of discussion.

[4] “If a man’s testicles are crushed or his penis is cut off, he may not be included in the assembly of the Lord” (Deut. 23:1).

[5] All three points are taken from information from the Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary of the New Testament.

[6] Expositor's Bible Commentary (Abridged Edition): New Testament

[7] Expositor's Bible Commentary (Abridged Edition): New Testament

[8] The Talmud is foundational to Rabbinic Judaism as a primary source of Jewish law and theology. It The Babylonian Talmud was written before the time of Jesus.

[9] A teaching within the Mishnah, a sort of commentary on the written law. It was written down starting in AD 200.

[10]“ Is the “The Suffering Servant” prophecy in Isaiah 53 about Jesus?” gotquestions.org

[11] “When Philip had baptized the eunuch, the Spirit of God showed him that it was not the will of God that he should accompany the eunuch to Meroe, but, on the contrary, that he should hasten away to Ashdod; as God had in that, and the neighboring places, work sufficient to employ him in.” (Adam Clarke)

[12] As Philip preached in all the cities of Palestine till he came to Caesarea, he must have preached in the different cities of the Philistine country, Ashdod, Akkaron, and Jamnia, and also in the principal parts of Samaria, as these lay in his way from Gaza to Caesarea. (Adam Clarke)

[13] “THE JEWISH ROOTS OF BAPTISM.” Oneforisrael.org

Harmony #56: The Cost of Following Jesus (Luke 9:51-62; Matthew 8:19-22)

Now when the days drew near for him to be taken up, Jesus set out resolutely (“set his face”) to go to Jerusalem.

In both Matthew and Luke’s Gospel, this incident is placed on the heels of Jesus doing the kind of miraculous things that drew a large crowd (even though the incidents are different). In Matthew’s gospel, he is trying to get away from large crowds when this incident happens.

It’s no surprise, then, that these three conversation reflect a Jesus who wasn’t interested in people following him because he was popular, or because they thought it was cool, or believed they could follow Jesus when it was convenient. Jesus demonstrated over and over that he wasn’t interested in numbers for numbers’ sake. He didn’t want Himself or His Kingdom to be trendy.

In Luke’s gospel, Jesus had just finished talking to his disciples about his upcoming death. Consider the grim circumstances as we see Jesus’ response to three potential followers. He knows what’s coming; he knows what his disciples are going to go through. They have no idea that he is literally going to be taking up a cross, and that they will follow him to Golgotha. The metaphors are about to become reality.

  He sent messengers on ahead of him. As they went along, they entered a Samaritan village to make things ready in advance for him, but the villagers refused to welcome him, because he was determined to go to Jerusalem.[1]

Now when his disciples James and John[2] saw this, they said, “Lord, do you want us to call fire to come down from heaven and consume them?” But He turned and rebuked them, and said, “You do not know what kind of spirit you belong to. For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men's lives but to save them,” and they went on to another village.

There was a reason Jesus had not sent the 12 to Samaritan villages yet. They weren’t ready. First, they took this insult way too personally. It wasn’t a secret that Samaritans did NOT worship in Jerusalem. This was part of the animosity between Jews and Samaritans. When the Samaritans found out Jesus was going to the Temple in Jerusalem, of course they weren’t going to help. To them, that was enabling false worship. Their response should not have been a surprise.

The disciples could have said, “Well, we tried. The worst they could do was say no.” Instead, they decided the best response would be to kill everyone – without having to get their hands dirty. Could God do it for them? Did God feel the same way about these Samaritans as they did?

The answer is, of course, no. “You do not know what kind of Spirit you belong to.” That was not the heart of God for the Samaritans. Don’t forget, this is right after all this teaching on forgiveness. Yikes. Tough crowd.

“Whatever…errors may be in religion, we must never persecute [those who believe them]. Let us, if needful, argue with them, reason with them, and try to show them a more excellent way. But let us never take up the "carnal" weapon to promote the spread of truth. Let us never be tempted, directly or indirectly, to persecute anyone, under pretense of the glory of Christ and the good of the Church. Let us rather remember, that the religion [professed] from fear of death, or dread of penalties, is worth nothing at all, and that if we swell our ranks by fear and threatening, in reality we gain no strength… The appeals that we make must be to…consciences and wills.”      - JC Ryle

Let’s pick up from there.

As they were walking along the road, an expert in the law came to him and said, “Teacher, I will follow you wherever you go.” Jesus said to him, “Foxes have dens and the birds in the sky have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head.”

Jesus said to another, “Follow me.” But he replied, “Lord, first let me go and bury my father.” But Jesus said to him, “Follow me, and let the dead bury their own dead, but as for you, go and proclaim the kingdom of God.”[3]

Yet another said, “I will follow you, Lord, but first let me say goodbye to my family.” Jesus said to him, “No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God.”

* * * * * *

The first man seems to be sincerely eager to be a part of what Jesus is doing. After all, he just saw some amazing things. Who wouldn’t want to be closer to that? I think Jesus’ response is similar to the response Jesus gave the Rich Young Ruler who also wanted to follow him.[4] Jesus said to that ruler, “Go get rid of all your money.” Jesus identified the idol that had to go.

To this man, Jesus uses an image from nature to point out that there is no expectation of comfort. I mean, they had just been denied access to town to spend the night. They were on their way to Jerusalem where Jesus would be killed and his disciples scattered.

My sense is that Jesus jumps straight to his vulnerability, his idol: the desire for comfort, maybe even popularity. “People won’t like you. They will reject you. You may even be denied ordinary, normal things by those who reject you. Follow me, and you might become deeply unpopular, despised, rejected, even unable to have the material comforts others enjoy.”

We should expect to be made uncomfortable as followers of Jesus. And our response should not be longing for God to judge them, but to save them.

* * * * *

The second man makes what seems to be a reasonable request (burying his father), but there is more going on here than first appears. Several options have been offered.[5] I think one stands out, but you will see the others in commentaries, so let’s take a look at them.

The first option is that the guy’s father had died and Jesus was telling him not to go help bury him. This is the least likely. In Judaism, someone who died had to be buried the same day.[6]There was no way that man would have been hanging out with Jesus. It was a really big deal to honor your parents with a proper burial. It’s also likely the father was not sick and close to dying, or the man would have asked Jesus to heal him.

The second option is that this was an expression meaning that he had to stay with his father as long as his father was alive. G. Campbell Morgan refers to a traveler in the Middle East who was trying to enlist a young Arab man as his guide. The man replied that he could not go because he had to bury his father. When the traveler expressed his sympathy, he learned that the young man’s father had not died; he was waiting to be a guide until he no longer had to take care of his father. So perhaps this man was saying, “After my father is gone, I will follow You.”[7]

[Another layer: the man would likely receive his inheritance when his father died. Leaving him might cause him to lose out on his share of his father’s estate.[8]]

The third option is that the man is waiting for the time a year after the body was first buried when the bones of the deceased were placed in an ossuary box and interred with other deceased relatives.[9]

Depending on which option is correct, it will change how you view what Jesus meant when he said, “let the dead bury the dead.”

Options #1 and #2 implies,

  • “Let the spiritually dead bury the physically dead; let those not yet alive to the claims of the kingdom bury the naturally dead.” [10]

  • Some wonder if this is about the vespillones, the corpse-bearers who carried out the bodies of the poor at night; in Hebrew phraseology, they were “the men of the dead.”[11]

Option #3 would read more like, “Let the already dead (the ancestors) take care of their own.”[12] After all, the man’s father had been honored in the burial already; the second step was tradition, and it was not an insult to his father not to observe it. I favor this reading.

“Jesus was saying in essence, “Look, you have already honored your father by giving him a proper burial in the family burial cave. Instead of waiting for the flesh to decompose, go preach the kingdom of God and tell the people that faith alone in Christ is the only true means of atonement.” (“Let The Dead Bury Their Dead - Meaning.” Alice Anacioco. biblical-christianity.com)

* * * * *

The third man’s request also seems reasonable – he’s going to follow, but he needs to say his goodbyes. This is not unprecedented in Jewish teaching.

Earlier in Luke 9, Jesus had already been connected with Elijah several times. Near the end of Elijah's ministry, God told him to call Elisha to take his place. Elijah found Elisha plowing a field with twelve yoke of oxen and placed his cloak on the younger man's shoulders. Elisha knew what this meant and asked permission to say goodbye to his parents, which Elijah allowed. Only then did Elisha follow Elijah (1 Kings 19:19–21).  So far so good. Reasonable request. But….

“’To bid farewell’ signifies to set apart or assign, as a soldier to his post or an official to his office, and later to detach soldiers. Hence to dismiss one with orders...the man desiring to return home, not merely to take formal leave, but also to give his final instructions to his friends and servants.” Vincent's Word Studies

In other words, it sure looks like the man has a back up plan. Whatever happens to him while following Jesus, Plan B is waiting for him if necessary. Jesus responds by playing off this same Old Testament text, since Elisha was plowing in his family’s field when Elijah met him:

“No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is fit for service in the kingdom of God.”

I like the careful wording of this verse in Meyer’s NT Commentary:

“No one who has offered to labor in my service, and, withal, still attaches his interest to his earlier relations is well fitted/adapted to labor for the kingdom of the Messiah.” 

The farmer must keep looking forward in order to plow a straight furrow. Likewise, a disciple constantly distracted by past associations cannot provide effective service for the kingdom of God.[13]

* * * * *

Jesus tells these three would-be disciples that a true disciple…

1.    Risks rejection by the world (57-58). Disciples do not put attach their hearts to earthly material comforts: wealth, comfort, reputation, tradition. “Don’t pity Jesus for having no place to rest his head. Pity the man so chained to his mortgage that he can’t respond to the call of Christ. Don’t pity Jesus for sleeping by the campfire. Pity the woman so sold to her career that she cannot follow Christ to a foreign land. Don’t pity the disciples who are called the “scum of the earth.” Pity those who are enslaved to the opinions of the world.“[14]

2.    Makes proclamation a priority (59-60) In the OT, only prophets were permitted to neglect funeral customs in order to reveal God’s revelation. So, Jesus’ call to ignore funeral customs signals that an important period of time has arrived on the divine calendar.Nothing should delay or stop us from spreading the good news that the Kingdom is here, not even good obligations and attachments.” (Daniel l. Sonnenberg)

3.    Leaves the old life behind (61-62) It is not an emotional, spur-of-the moment decision. It is not a decision that can be postponed till later. It is not a phase we go through while we keep our options open. Following Jesus means signing away the rights to your own life. You sign on the bottom line and let him fill in the details. It means Jesus first. No conditions. No delays. No buts. No excuses. A disciple cannot trust Jesus halfway. “Christ must reign in the heart without a rival. All other loves and all other loyalties must be secondary.” (Believer’s Bible Commentary)

* * * * *

So, how do we summarize the lesson today?

I wonder: what is really first in your life? Are we saying to Jesus, “I will follow you,” but adding our qualification, our disclaimer under our breath, perhaps hoping Jesus won’t hear? God first…but really being successful first, career first, financial well-being first. God first…but really being a good citizen, or being nice and well-liked first. God first…but really comfort and safety and security first.

When God calls you, and you say yes to following Jesus, what are the “buts” that are on the tip of your tongue, or muttered under your breath, or the truth you really mean instead? How do you finish this sentence to Jesus, “I will follow you, but first let me…” what?

Jesus tries to convey to us a sense of urgency. The good news doesn’t have time to wait. The world needs the message of Jesus right now. Look around. Look at the news. Look at the headlines. Look at our nation. Look at our community. Look at our congregation. Look at your own life.

We need the message of Jesus, the news about God’s reign on earth, the good news of God’s grace and favor and God’s way that rejects the ways of greed and selfishness and oppression and we need it now. And so Jesus needs disciples, messengers of the good news right now. People who are ready to say “But first you God, and then everything else can come next.”

 – Beth Quick, bethquick.com


________________________________________________________________________________

[1] The Samaritans probably rejected the messengers because Samaritans did not accept Jerusalem as the place of worship (see John 4:20)

[2] James eventually gave his life as a martyr; John became known as the Apostle of Love.

[4] Mark 10:17-27

[5] I’ll add here in the footnotes that it is possible that Jesus, who is about to take a Nazarite vow, is giving this man a heads up: if he truly follows the example of Jesus, he would not be able to bury his father when it was time.‘All the days of his separation to the LORD he shall not go near to a dead person. He shall not make himself unclean for his father or for his mother, for his brother or for his sister, when they die, because his separation to God is on his head. All the days of his separation he is holy to the LORD.” (Numbers 6:6-8)

[6] “In Jesus’ culture, the obligation to bury one’s father took precedence even over saying the Shema (The Challenge of Jesus: Rediscovering Who Jesus Was and Is by N.T. Wright)? So how could Jesus tell His disciples not to go bury their fathers?According to first-century Jewish burial customs, when a person died, they were normally buried immediately (usually on the same day) in the family burial cave that had been hewn out of bedrock. This custom is based on the injunction found in the Mosaic Law not to leave the corpse of an executed person on the tree overnight (Deuteronomy 21:22-23).” (Let The Dead Bury Their Dead – Meaning,” Alice Anacioco, biblical-christianity.com)

[7] As cited by Steven Cole at preceptaustin.com

[8] “He wanted to make sure he received his inheritance. Then, when his circumstances were secure, he’d be equipped to be a disciple.” (Tony Evans Study Bible)

[9] “After the body was placed in a burial cave and is left to decompose, the family will separate itself and mourn for seven days. This initial mourning period is called shivah which is followed by a less intense 30-day period of mourning called shloshim. However, the entire mourning period was not fully over. The final act of mourning is when the family would return after a year to gather all the bones and place them with the bones of other family members on another shelf or the floor. This is now the secondary burial, also referred to as ossilegium. In the Jerusalem Talmud, it says, “When the flesh had wasted away, the bones were collected and placed in chests (ossuaries). On that day (the son) mourned, but the following day he was glad because his forebears rested from judgment” (Moed Qatan 1:5). (“Let The Dead Bury Their Dead” Meaning. Alice Anacioco.) biblical-christianity.com)

[10] Blessed Theophylact gives a concise explanation: “He is saying, “Let your dead relatives, that is, those who do not believe, take care of your unbelieving father in his old age until death.” To bury means here to bestow care on him even to the grave. Even in common parlance we say, “So and so buried his father,” which means not only that he placed him in the ground when he died, but that he also did every other good thing for him that was necessary, caring for him until his end and his burial.” (Let The Dead Bury Their Dead,” Fr. John Whiteford, OrthoChristian.com)

[11] Expositor's Greek Testament

[12] “The phrase “own dead” indicates the inclusion of the fathers among the dead.
“He's essentially making a joke, saying, "Your dad's bones aren't going anywhere. They are safe in the family tomb with all your other ancestors. I'm sure they'll keep him company"; in other words, "Let the dead (your other ancestors in the family tomb) take care of your father's bones until someone else in the family shows up to bury them." (“Let The Dead Bury Their Own Dead,” http://unamsanctamcatholicam.blogspot.com/2018/07/let-dead-bury-their-own-dead.html)

[13] Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds of the New Testament

[14] The Three Rookies: Christ Speaks to the Problem of Convenient Excuses.” Ray Pritchard